Plan Execution
Execute plans in batches of 3 tasks with verification checkpoints. Ensures progress tracking and quality gates.
When to Use
- Executing implementation plans
- Running multi-task workflows
- Tracking progress through checkpoints
- Coordinating with architect/lead reviews
Don’t use for:
- Creating plans (use writing-plans skill)
- Debugging (use systematic-debugging skill)
Critical Patterns
✅ REQUIRED: Batch Execution (3 Tasks per Batch)
Execute 3 tasks, then checkpoint before next batch.
### Batch 1: Foundation
#### Task 1: Create User entity (2 min)
**File**: `src/entities/User.ts`
**Implementation**:
[typescript code]
**Status**: Complete
---
**CHECKPOINT**: Batch 1 Complete
**Verification**:
- Ran: `npm test -- UserEntity.test.ts crypto.test.ts UserRepository.test.ts`
- Result: 8/8 tests passed
- Build: `npm run build` → Success
- Lint: `npm run lint` → 0 errors
**Decision**: Proceed to Batch 2
---
### Batch 2: API Layer
[next 3 tasks...]
Why batch size 3?
- Natural checkpoint rhythm (every 6-10 minutes)
- Small enough to catch issues early
- Large enough to make meaningful progress
- Easy to track percentage: 33%, 66%, 100%
✅ REQUIRED: Checkpoint After Each Batch
Verify quality before proceeding.
**CHECKPOINT**: Batch 2 Complete
**Verification**:
1. Tests passing? Yes
- Ran: `npm test`
- Result: 15/15 passed
2. Build succeeds? Yes
- Ran: `npm run build`
- Result: Compiled successfully
3. Lint clean? Yes
- Ran: `npm run lint`
- Result: 0 errors, 0 warnings
4. Type check? Yes
- Ran: `tsc --noEmit`
- Result: No type errors
**Architect Review Needed?** No (straightforward CRUD implementation)
**Blockers?** None
**Decision**: Proceed to Batch 3
Checkpoint serves as:
- Quality gate (don’t proceed if tests fail)
- Progress marker (33% → 66% → 100%)
- Review opportunity (pause for feedback)
- Rollback point (if issues found, revert to last checkpoint)
✅ REQUIRED: Progress Tracking
Track overall progress across batches.
### Overall Progress
**Completed Batches**: 2/4 (50%)
**Completed Tasks**: 6/12 (50%)
**Current Batch**: Batch 3 (tasks 7-9)
**Remaining**: Batch 4 (tasks 10-12)
**Status**: On track
**Blockers**: None
**Risks**: None identified
**Timeline**:
- Batch 1: Completed 2:15 PM (7 min)
- Batch 2: Completed 2:28 PM (9 min)
- Batch 3: In progress (started 2:30 PM)
- Batch 4: Not started
**Estimated completion**: 3:00 PM (30 min total)
Benefits:
- Visibility into completion percentage
- Early detection of delays
- Data for future estimations
- Clear handoff points
✅ REQUIRED: Architect Review at Key Points
Escalate for review when needed.
**CHECKPOINT**: Batch 2 Complete
**Architect Review Required**: YES
**Reason**:
- API versioning strategy decision needed
- Breaking change to /users endpoint (removing deprecated fields)
**Questions for Architect**:
1. Preferred approach: /v2/users or query param ?version=2?
2. Deprecation timeline: immediate or gradual?
**Blocking**: Cannot proceed to Batch 3 until architect approves approach
[After architect feedback]
**Architect Decision**: Use /v2/users, 3-month deprecation for /v1/users
**Decision**: Resume execution
When to escalate:
- Complex architectural decisions
- Security-critical changes
- API contract modifications (breaking changes)
- Database schema changes
- Performance-critical code
- New external dependencies
- Deviation from original plan
Decision Tree
Executing a plan?
→ Group into batches of 3 tasks
→ Execute batch sequentially
→ Checkpoint (verify all 3 tasks)
→ Architect review needed?
→ YES: Escalate, document questions, wait for decision
→ NO: Proceed to next batch
→ Repeat until all batches complete
Task blocked?
→ Document blocker clearly
→ Skip to next unblocked task (if possible)
→ Return to blocked task after resolution
Quality issue at checkpoint?
→ STOP execution
→ Identify root cause
→ Fix issues in current batch
→ Re-verify checkpoint
→ Only then proceed
Task taking longer than planned?
→ Note actual time
→ Adjust estimates for remaining tasks
→ Flag if timeline at risk
Edge Cases
Task dependencies within batch: If Task 2 depends on Task 1, that’s fine. If Task 5 depends on Task 2 (cross-batch), ensure checkpoint captures that dependency.
Partial batch completion: If only 2 of 3 tasks done (blocker on Task 3), checkpoint what’s done, escalate blocker.
**CHECKPOINT**: Batch 2 PARTIAL (2/3 complete)
**Completed**:
- Task 4
- Task 5
**Blocked**:
- Task 6: External API credentials missing
- **Blocker**: Need API key from DevOps team
- **ETA**: 2 hours
**Decision**: Proceed to Batch 3 (tasks 7-9), return to Task 6 later
Critical failure: If checkpoint fails badly (many tests broken, build fails), stop and roll back.
**CHECKPOINT**: Batch 3 FAILED
**Issue**: 12 tests failing after refactor
**Root cause**: Breaking change in User interface
**Impact**: High - core functionality broken
**Decision**: STOP and ROLLBACK
- Revert commits from Batch 3
- Return to Batch 2 (last known good state)
- Re-plan Batch 3 with different approach
Fast batches (<5 min total): Combine next batch if work is trivial. Example: “Batch 2+3 combined (6 small tasks, 8 min total)”.
Checklist
- Tasks grouped into batches of 3
- Batch execution order documented
- Checkpoint after each batch with verification
- Progress tracking updated after each batch
- Architect review identified at key decision points
- Blockers documented with escalation path
- Actual time tracked vs estimates
- Rollback plan if checkpoint fails
Example
See references/execution-walkthrough.md for a complete 3-batch execution walkthrough.
Resources
- writing-plans - Creating executable plans
- verification-protocol - Checkpoint verification
- code-review - Quality review after execution
- systematic-debugging - Handling checkpoint failures
- references/README.md - Reference file navigation
- references/execution-walkthrough.md - Complete 3-batch example